Abstract:
Correction
of Tibial Deformity using the Ilizarov/ Taylor Spatial Frame
Presenting
Author: Svetlana Ilizarov, MD; Hospital for Special Surgery
Co-authors:
S.
Robert Rozbruch, MD; Hospital for Special Surgery
Gavriil Ilizarov, New York University
Arkady Blyakher, MD; Hospital for Special Surgery
What
was the question?
The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is an evolution of the classic Ilizarov
frame. It utilizes a computer program, which helps calculate a schedule
for gradual strut and frame adjustment to simultaneously correct multiple
aspects of deformity around a "virtual hinge" without the need for
complicated frame modification. There are few reports in the literature
regarding deformity correction using TSF. This computer program has
two modes. The chronic mode requires inputting deformity parameters
and pre-building a frame prior to surgery. The total residual mode
is a newer program, which allows application of the rings first followed
by easy connection of struts and the use of the program following
surgery. There are no reports to our knowledge regarding clinical
effectiveness of this mode. The purpose of this study is to review
and evaluate the results of the gradual deformity correction using
TSF.
Methods: Forty-two patients (50 tibiae) underwent osteotomy
surgery for deformity correction using the Taylor Spatial Frame between
2000 and 2003. There were 25 males and 17 females with an average
age of 38 (range: 11-64). Malunion was the most common etiology (23
limbs). Other causes included developmental deformity such as genu
varum (19 limbs) or genu valgum (4 limbs) with pain and/or osteoarthritis,
congenital deformity (2) and neurologic disorders (2). The osteotomy
was performed near the apex of the deformity, which was at the proximal
tibia in 33, middle tibia in 9 and distal tibia in 8. Varus angulation
was the most common deformity. Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and
joint orientation angles were used to evaluate the deformity. Rotational
deformity was assessed clinically. Twenty-five patients had leg length
discrepancy with 3.1cm average (range: 0.4Ð 22 cm). Tibia and fibula
osteotomies were performed for deformity correction. Bilateral deformity
was corrected in 8 patients (3 of them had one stage procedure). Simultaneous
ankle arthrodesis was done in 2 patients and gradual correction of
ankle equinus in one. Double level osteotomy was performed on one
tibia. One patient underwent simultaneous correction of the femur
deformity. Chronic correction mode was used on 14 tibiae with prebuilt
frame. Total residual mode was utilized on 36 limbs with the rings
first method. Clinical, radiographic parameters, SF-36 and AAOS lower
limb module scores were assessed.
What are the results?
The average follow up was 19 months (range: 2-47). Planned deformity
correction in different planes was achieved in all cases using TSF
with chronic or residual mode. The average medial MAD improved from
28 mm (range: 9-100) to 4 mm medial (range: 0-9) or to 7 mm lateral
(range: 1-13) in cases with hypercorrection. The average lateral MAD
improved from 42 mm (range: 9-80) to 0 and in cases of osteoarthritis
was overcorrected to 9 mm medial to midline (range: 4-18) to unload
affected compartment of the knee. Simultaneous lengthening of 2.1
cm (range: 0.4-6) was done in 14 patients (16 limbs). Average time
in a frame was 131 days (range: 77-355) and there were no nonunions.
SF-36 improved in 4 categories. AAOS lower limb module scores increased
from 76 to 89. Complications included cellulitis in one patient who
was successfully treated with IV antibiotics, neuropraxia in 3 patients,
which resolved after nerve release surgeries (all of these patients
had previous lengthening procedures on the same limb in other institutions).
One patient sustained a contralateral femur fracture after a fall
during treatment and underwent open reduction and internal fixation.
What are your conclusions?
Osteotomy of the tibia and fibula and the use of the Ilizarov/ Taylor
Spatial Frame can be used effectively to correct leg deformities.
All aspects of deformity are addressed including length. This technique
uses a minimally invasive approach and gradual deformity correction.
While both chronic and total residual programs were accurately used,
the rings first total residual method is more user friendly.
Presented
to: The Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society: ASAMINorth
America
Fourteenth Annual Scientific Meeting